Wuornos

I just have to say that I love the fact that this site permits a continuation of a discussion once deemed locked. I appreciate the whole freedom of speech thing. I prefer to see people's real opinions rather than drive them underground into a freaky taboo zone where god knows what can fester.
just my humble opinion.

Britana

/agree and find that a major plus for the site. And for the record, once it crosses the line of illegality (which certainly some suggested action in this thread does, depending on interpretation), then I oppose it. On the other hand, safe, sane and consensual foot/heel sucking/licking/kissing between adults is fine by me. Somewhere in these threads that issue came up, iirc.

Nigel

There is no harm in freedom of speech here, but be aware that if you are doing things to other folks property without their knowledge, then be prepared to accept my opinion on your actions. men that go around stealing/borrowing shoes or boots for their own pleasure give the rest of us a bad name.

I love the smell of warm leather, but not smelly feet YUK! btw.

Even though some members are going to enjoy stealing or borrowing shoes for their own pleasure, I am not too sure if this site wants to have anything to do with it. I certainly don't want to be a part of it, its immoral and at the worst theft.

However, if you want to buy some old worn shoes, then go ahead, My wife quite often sells them and has some now for sale, go on knock yourself out, but do it with your own shoes please.

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. RFC1925.

skylined

An interesting debate.

Firstly, if anyone read my post properly, I said that it wasn't right and maybe considered gross. Immoral? - yes. Harmful/hurtful? no.

Secondly, I did not say that I engage in such activity - I don't. I also wouldn't agree with anyone stealing women's shoes, though I don't think stealing was actually mentioned anywhere.

My logic is sound - mugging somebody is hurtful and can scar a victim permanently. It doesn't have to be physical - a drunken ned shouting "you fat b***ard" to someone on the street could be very damaging. By comparison, a woman slipping her foot into a shoe without knowing what had been done to it previously hurts nobody. People reading that are making judgements from the perspective of knowing what happened, and are grossed out by it.

I think I'm really looking back to the original locked thread in a way, where everyone jumped onto their high horses and slagged one particular member off quite severely. Again, I am not saying what he likes doing is right, but simply pointing out that there is no need for such a song and dance over it.

And thanks for everyone's thoughts - I'll look forward to the next round of slanging

Nigel

well, the thread is called 'part 2' so therefore I assume we carry on. and yes, I did read the whole thread including your post and you did say that you thought there was nothing wrong with the activity

This kind of behavior is unacceptable.

__________________
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. RFC1925.

Tech

Skylined

One thing you WILL find here is that the team are VERY careful to read everything carefully before commenting and/or taking action, often with more debating about it "behind the scenes" as it were.

What you said does clearly state that you are referring to footwear taken without consent, and has "something" done to it while out of its owners possesion.

You guys wonder why we have to have rules to keep guys out of the girls forum....

__________________
Heels 4 Men - Guys in heels, as guys!

thedesigner

agreed: ive had asbos from the moderators, mainly cos i'm from london and we tell it like it is, but please dont try and have a turkish and spoil it for the rest of us !!
This is a borderline subject, not my cuppa, near the edge....
And the ladies will all call "wierdo", je me pense....

skylined

Well, I think there would be quite a majority of people that would cry "weirdo" concerning men waltzing about in women's shoes and stockings in front of their bedroom mirror - some probably even donning a bit of lipstick, pouting up to the mirror and exclaiming in a guttural voice "F*ck me, f*ck me!!" .... kinda like the weirdo in Silence of the Lambs.

Every bit as strange as a man fancying a little hand-shuffle into a sexy shoe!!

Anywayz, I must be off - and occupy my mind with more gainful pursuits.

hhboots

hmmm.

fetishes are fine, if the person doesn't act immoral or do things to impact others. ...but some comments in this thread sure make the guys look bad.

RPMindy

forgive me for sounding lost... but if i am not mistaken, Nina sold her shoes and the guy who bought them expressed his gratitude and enjoyment of her shoes.

so, isn't the subject about selling used shoes? and asking gals how they feel about it? and of course guys are welcome to comment?


my take, i much rather guys who are shoe huffers buy their used shoes... the seller must be aware that they are sold for use as the buyers see fit. no harm no foul there!

i mean.. if there was serious money to be made, and i didn't mind the potential stigma, heck, i'd be a vendor myself!!! but... the idea doesn't tickle me that much.


by the way, the most i'll get out of it, is removing the gal's shoes (in my case, my wife) after she wore her heels a few hours to give her a massage. that aroma works for me.. and only in that setting. other than that... nope.. doesn't work for me... oh.. and that also doesn't work with very old worn heels either.

RPM

p.s. cumming in anyone's shoes that they own without their expressed consent is not cool (that discussion was on the table.. so i figured i'd comment)... one day, laws every where will catch on and make it punishable by law. some places have caught on, others have not. but for those who feel it's cool.. just don't do it in my wife's shoes.. and i won't care

__________________
www.highheeledwomen.phpbbserver.com/