Thighboots2

I have long been a fan of women or as call them, left handed trousers. I find the cuff to be larger then the equivalent in a men trouser this has the benefit of fitting a heeled shoe better. My straight leg womens trousers are 2" bigger than my mens bootcut trousers, and the bootcut womens are 4" bigger than the mens bootcut. I suspect its to do with the semiconcealled shoe look because a tighter cuff doesn't hang so nicely. Small detail, but one I notice on many women who try to wear slim leg trousers to cover the shoe, looks untidy.

I use them for work, so they are the formal type with a front and back crease. Another benefit is the material is much lighter than a mans trouser and so is far more comfortable to wear. Pockets if they exist are next to useless, hence why I am a devoted bag carrier.

I would disagree with FF's earlier suggestion to avoid black is possible, as long as they are clean and well pressed, then they blend to the shoe, and we mostly wear black shoes anyway, so do not create a contrast that draws the eye. Easier with formal wear of course where black trousers are almost a standard.

Freddy, haven't you heard? flares are back. One of my trousers are boot-cut and have a big cuff, but the flare is very well done. Big advantage is you get lots of air round your legs so they are really comfortable in warm weather.

I would heartily recommend the wearing of womens cut trousers, if they fit you. THe Aura jeans by Wrangler are really nice. They are just like guy jeans with a bit of stretch and useful pockets and right handed as well. IMHO, Wrangler have always made the best jeans.

Everyone should listen to Kneehighs advice, he is the man who knows. Our own personal style guru. Heels or not, you should be critical about how you look. Compared to the ladies, the effort required for men is minimal yet the benefit is unmeasurable.

Simon.

__________________
Are you confusing me with someone who gives a damn?

fastfreddy2

Simon,

"out of context" again fella. I've met shyguy, have you? That advise was tilted directly at him?


Context (yet again ) .... Where did I say I don't wear flares? In fact, of the [currently 16 pairs] I think only 4 or 5 are straight legged. And I mentioned Wrangler Aura jeans myself, some time ago? [From the US?]



It'll be back to 14 by the end of today. The jeans claim to be 34" long, but are actually 33". I've several pairs this size, with much better fitting waist. The N/L Hula's are claimed as 'Regular' waist, but seem a tad lower to me, so while their cost is attractive, the fit isn't. In fact the 12's fitted well to loose. But I don't have a pierced belly-button to justify the slightly lower waist-band and the problem this brings in keeping the ankle hem at the right height. [Low enough to hide a heel, but not so low I'm walking on them. ]


Glad to see some positive input on this matter from some members who are interested in dressing well.


P.S.

Just read this post, which is pertinent because of this picture.

Notice that Johnieheel has a slightly flared jean on. [Look at his right leg in the background, which has not been raised to show his shoe style.] This cut of jean produces a flattering look, and enables more discreet use of HH when out and about.



....

Puma

For many years now I've been wearing trousers and jeans that were purchased from 'womens' stores and shops. I always get either the bootcut or flared leg versions, and I buy them in a variety of lengths to suit all occasions, ie some are longer length for complete stealth mode when wearing heels, and some are a suitable length for when I'm wearing trainers/flat shoes etc.
I do find the cut and fit much more comfortable, and often the prices are more reasonable too.
One thing that sometimes bothers me, is which side the zip closure is on.
Mostly womens trousers close to the left, which obviously defines them as 'womens', but even when I have worn such trousers in formal situations, no one has ever noticed, but sometimes I still feel conscious about it.
However, there are also some manufacturers/stores that sell 'womens' trousers/jeans with the closure to the right, Miss Sixty and GAP spring to mind.
Some of the 'flared' trousers and jeans are wide enough to cover the whole shoe, which makes them also obviously 'womens' as it's virtually impossible to find such trousers in 'mens' stores.
But like our choice in footwear, why should trousers etc be gender specific?

Oh one other thing, I never ever get that certain disapproving look from my wife when I have even the most obviously looking 'womens' trousers on! Wish it was the same when I wear heels!

heelma

What do you guys think of boot cut pants from Banana Republic? They have a "long/tall" version of many styles, which means an inseam of 36". I never tried those, but I am kind of tempted.
Example:
http://www.bananarepublic.com/browse...576&pid=587836

fastfreddy2

36" inseam is long, and probably needs quite a platform unless you have unusually long legs?

The sewn in cuff/turn-up at the bottom of the trouser has been seen by myself over a here a number of times and looks good, especially with longer pointed-shoe styles. The material must be lightweight for this 'cuff' to work, and might be there because the material is lightweight. [The cuff making sure the lower part of the trouser keeps its shape?] A spring/summer style then? Or 'office' wear?

If your chosen shoe to wear with the trousers would be those in your avatar, I could see them working very well.

....

heelma

When I wear 5 1/2" heels with a platform, I can just cover them with 38"(!) jeans. I posted pictures how that looks somewhere here (need to find it, then I'll post a link).
I'm not going to wear 8" on the streets anymore. I wore the ones in my avatar maybe 2 years ago, and they broke when I tripped with them

Booted

I've a pair of these jeans. They are great, stylish, not too tight, and very comfortable. The 36" inseam is overstated. In realaty they are more like 34" to 35" inseam.

Mr. X

I was browsing through one of the local thrift shops here today. I have always been looking for a pair of womens trousers that might serve well on a guy. Not only do I think I found a pair, but because it was thrift I ended up paying 10 bucks for them. The pants themselves are just a basic black stretch type trouser with a bit of a belted waist. They fit perfect, and are perfect length for wearing with heels. I posted a couple of pics in the guys section under the freestyle picture thread. Check em out.

HappyFeat

I am a 6'2", 225 pound guy with a 32" inseam and 34"-36" waist. I have tried many different styles of men's trousers and jeans with heels> Even going with a longer inseam didn't seem to really make the grade. I have had luck with Polo, Banana Republic, and the GAP, but nothing that really met my satisfaction.

Recently, I discovered a line of jeans and trousers from Lane Bryant stores in the US called "Right Fit." I went to the store, the clerk took my measurements and gave me some pants to try. The jeans fit me amazingly well so I tried the trousers and loved those too. I have never had better fitting pants that just look great with heels. (At least in my opinion, since I am still learning about fashion)

Both the pants and the jeans look to be of very nice quality and I know Lane Bryant was a solid label for plus size women when they were still part of Limited brands. But they have been spun off and are now part of the same company that owns the Fashion Bug chain (or as my GF calls it 'Fashion Slug') which is not known for quality.

I am not sure if they have Lane Bryant outside the US, but for those in the US, I suggest getting measured and finding your fit. The "Right Fit" line does not use the traditional sizing system, but rater a scale from 1-7 with inseams in short, average, and tall. A 3T fits me wonderfully with heels and a 3 Average is great for low heels or flats (or men's shoes.) Here is the link to Lane Bryant's site, specifically about the "Right Fit" bottoms:

http://www.lanebryant.com/pagebuilde...t_landing_page

I have heard that the calculator is less than accurate, but I know that there is a link to a sizing chart somewhere in the site. Also, Lane Bryant offers free shipping and runs pretty descent sales from time to time. The jeans cost about $40 US and the trousers about $50.

If there are other brands that do a similar thing, in bottoms for either gender, please post it.