High Heel Place - View Single Post

jmc · 7th September 2008, 19:26

I don't have direct experience with Flickr but I have used Photobucket. Photobucket has a a feature whereby you can make certain pictures private, protected by a password. Anybody with the password can get to them but the world at large cannot. Basically you set up subdirectories in your account and you can password-protect some or all of them as you wish. You can still link out to pictures in password-protected directories but nobody can browse the folder without the password.

Flickr may have the same functionality.

7th September 2008, 19:26	#48 (permalink)
jmc Website Team Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Michigan, USA I am Male Posts: 1,695 Thanks: 42 Thanked 147 Times in 110 Posts My Mood: Rep Power: 21	Re: Image attachments instead of embedding? I don't have direct experience with Flickr but I have used Photobucket. Photobucket has a a feature whereby you can make certain pictures private, protected by a password. Anybody with the password can get to them but the world at large cannot. Basically you set up subdirectories in your account and you can password-protect some or all of them as you wish. You can still link out to pictures in password-protected directories but nobody can browse the folder without the password. Flickr may have the same functionality. __________________ Have a happy time! Last edited by jmc : 8th September 2008 at 03:33. Reason: add explanation